This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 29 April 2013 20:29, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com> wrote: > Why doesn't Atmel submit their patches upstream? They would never be accepted as long as they make modifications to cpu-agnostic portions of GCC. > As an embedded FOSS community, we need to be encouraging > vendors.. prodding them.. to submit their tools upstream. Absolutely. After all, chip vendors make their money by selling silicon, not compilers. But it's not only a technical issue. The GCC maintainers also need to believe that the port will continue to be maintained, tested, the code updated to new versions of GCC, that bugs found will be fixed and so on, i.e. a commitment from the vendor to help with to the ongoing work of software maintenance. M -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |