This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Bryan, All, As we discussed some days ago on IRC, and as we now have the ability to use a custom (aka. local) copy of gcc, it no longer makes sense to have our own retrieval method to get gcc from its svn repo. It is expected that people who want to use gcc from svn, do so because they either want to test bleeding-edge, or want to test their own changes. In either case, we can expect them to already have a local checkout/export. Bryan, do you still agree with this? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. PS. For the other components that have the same /feature/ (eg. newlib from CVS, uClibc snapshots), I'll remove the corresponding code soon, too. For eglibc, we still need to get it from svn, as it's the only channel by which eglibc is _officially_ available from. YEM. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |