This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Trevor, All, On Friday 07 September 2012 17:46:00 Trevor Woerner wrote: > I used the 1.16.0 release of crosstool-NG to attempt to create the > arm-bare_newlib_cortex_m3_nommu-eabi toolchain but was not successful. > > $ ct-ng arm-bare_newlib_cortex_m3_nommu-eabi > $ ct-ng menuconfig > (small tweaks to the configuration to add make-3.81-native and adjust > a couple paths) > $ ct-ng build The sample without tweaks builds just fine here. Can you check that it is also the case (without your tweaks!) on your side? > I followed the same steps with 1.15.0 and it succeeded without problems. > > I can't help notice that with 1.15.0 the order of build is: > [INFO ] Extracting, patching and installing companion tools > [INFO ] Installing GMP for host > [INFO ] Installing MPFR for host > [INFO ] Installing PPL for host > [INFO ] Installing CLooG/PPL for host > [INFO ] Installing binutils for host > [INFO ] Installing elf2flt for host > [INFO ] Installing pass-2 core C compiler > [INFO ] Installing C library > [INFO ] Installing final compiler > [INFO ] Finishing C library > > but for 1.16.0 the order is: > [INFO ] Extracting, patching and installing companion tools > [INFO ] Installing MPFR for host > [INFO ] Installing PPL for host > [INFO ] Installing CLooG/PPL for host > [INFO ] Installing binutils for host > [INFO ] Installing elf2flt for host > [INFO ] Installing pass-1 core C compiler > [INFO ] Installing pass-2 core C compiler > [INFO ] Installing final compiler > (failure) > > Notice how with 1.15.0, after finishing up pass-2 of the > cross-compiler, it does the C library, then the final compiler. With > 1.16.0 it tries to do the final compiler immediately after pass-2. Yes, that's because your .config has: CT_LIBC="none" That is, no C library is selected (which may be valid in some cases, but is not on yours). Was that a deliberate tweak of yours? If so, why do you not want to use a C library? > The start of the errors from my 1.16.0 build look like the following > line and are followed by many such similar lines: [--SNIP--] No need to look at this part of the log, the error happens before that. ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |