This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Yann, All, > This is a known issue. glibc does not build with 'fortify'. > Please try setting: > C-library ---> > (-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE) extra target CFLAGS I suppose this also apply to eglibc? I also found symlinks with "double slash" in path like below in the target tree, are they normal, why is that using "double slash"? /opt/x-tools/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/arm-none-linux-gnueabi$ ls -la total 20 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 2010-10-07 23:26 . drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2010-10-07 23:26 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2010-10-07 23:26 bin drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2010-10-07 20:38 debug-root lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 2010-10-07 20:38 include -> .//sys-root/usr/include lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2010-10-07 20:38 lib -> .//sys-root/lib drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2010-10-07 20:38 sys-root Beside, why is that required to generate two levels of "arm-none-linux-gnueabi", can I eliminate one level or there are special purposes for setup like this? When a 'ct-ng build' aborted and configuration adjusted / problem fixed, is it safe to simple 'ct-ng build' again or should I resume from the exact failed step? Is there easy way to figure out which is the current step or have to dig through the build log? Thank you for your patient to all these newbie questions... I really learn a lot from this tool because it actually let you see the real process in action with logs to examine how things get done step by step and what configuration being used, etc. Regards, Samson -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |