This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Using crosstool-ng 1.7.0, unable to find -lstdc++when compiling c++


On Wednesday, June 9, 2010, Yann E. MORIN
<yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:
> Chris, All,
>
> On Wednesday 09 June 2010 02:18:00 Chris Morgan wrote:
>> I think I've made some progress. It looks like the arguments passed to
>> the makefile in build-cc-core-baremetal are missing a target that
>> would have built libstdc++.a.
>> If I run 'make' with no arguments in build-cc-core-baremetal I see
>> several libraries built, including libstdc++. A 'find -name *.a' finds
>> libstdc++.a after the make.
>
> Yes, I just tested it, and it builds a libstdc++.a. That's positive! :-)
>
>> What I can't tell is where in scripts/gcc.sh, it looks like right at
>> line 216 or 219, and what target it missing. I looked in the Makefile
>> but I can't figure out which target to use. Maybe something changed in
>> the later releases of gcc that moved the libstdc++ target outside of
>> the ones specified in gcc.sh?
>
> I'm looking into this right now... It seems it fits on lines 236+. But it's
> worse than it, because libstdc++ requires headers that are isntalled by the
> C library. This means it will probably require using cc_core_pass_2... :-(
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
> --
> .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
> | ?Yann E. MORIN ?| Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
> | +33 662 376 056 | Software ?Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN ? ? | ?___ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
> | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: ?X ?AGAINST ? ? ?| ?\e/ ?There is no ?|
> | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL ? ?| ? v ? conspiracy. ?|
> '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
>
>
>


The issue is having to do another make/install pass after the first
one or is that build target more time consuming? I don't really
understand the gcc build flow at this point.

Chris

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]