This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello Yann, On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:42:37 +0100 "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote: > > The sample selects ltrace 0.5.2, while a newer version, 0.5.3 is > > available. This newer version seems to have a fix for this issue, in > > the form of a patch already included in crosstool-ng: > > patches/ltrace/0.5.3/160-fix-missing-ptrace-defines.patch > > Go ahead with ltrace-0.5.3, it should buid (built just OK here). It works fine with ltrace 0.5.3. So the samples should probably be updated and/or ltrace 0.5.2 fixed (or removed in favor of 0.5.3 ?). Thanks for your answer, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |