This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 9/9/09, H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com> wrote: > >> I used arm920t instead of ep9312 but I believe ep9312 is just an alias. > > for arm920t, yes. It also passes "armv4t+maverick" to the assembler > So with "arm920t" does the assembler work ok for the ep93xx or should it > be "ep9312"? Yes, arm920t is fine. Just pretend the maverick isn't there. :) You only need ep9312 if you include maverick assembler fragments or are using my fixed GCCs for Maverick http://martinwguy.co.uk/martin/crunch I got back to "no known bugs" in this stuff again three days ago, so if you have FP-intensive stuff to run it might be worth trying. M -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |