This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Sam Brightman wrote: > I have been trying to build executables for a client who uses > Sparc/Solaris from an Intel machine. The basic question is: is this > possible? Is it possible with reasonable effort? Assuming "from an Intel machine" in your question refers to building the executables, i.e. "can I use an x86 machine to build native SPARC/Solaris binaries", the answer is: yes, you can. It isn't too difficult. We haven't built on a native SPARC host in years. > Our application builds on Windows, Linux, Solaris > (Nexenta/Belenix/sometimes running under VMware), and under crosstools > 0.43 on Linux/Solaris (targetting Sparc). The crosstools compiled > version gives a "can't find ld-linux.so.2" error on the client's machine > (even when built under Solaris). Statically linking gives an illegal > instruction. ldd on the Solaris (non-crosstools) built ELF shows no link > to ld-linux.so. Is this always going to be a problem because crosstools > is using it's private copy of Linux libraries even under Solaris? It sounds like your cross compiler is picking up Linux (headers?/)libs. You need to copy native Solaris SPARC libs and headers into your cross compile environment, so it builds against them. I've always built my cross compilers myself (not with crosstool) so I don't know the details, but somewhere in the process you need to say where those native libs and headers are. > Does anyone have any better suggestions? What are the potential issues > if we decide to buy an old Sparc machine? Hardware failure? Backup of machine? Extra networking layer affecting speed/reliability. Having a simple DVD that contains a cross compiler environment that will work on any dozens of machines laying around is really nice. As an example compare: "Hey, we just upgraded our build machine to a quad-core 8ghz machine, now a build of all platforms takes 3 seconds!" v.s. "Hey, we just upgraded our build machine to a quad-core 8ghz machine, now the Linux build finishes in 2 seconds, but the full build still takes 2 hours because we're waiting on Ye Olde SPARC box to do the Solaris SPARC build." -Nathan -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |