This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: arm & mips & glibc >= 2.4 ??

From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh at wantstofly dot org>
To: Olexiy Avramchenko <aolexiy at gmail dot com>
Cc: Chris MacGregor <chris at tigerwave dot com>, crossgcc at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:30:36 +0100
Subject: Re: arm & mips & glibc >= 2.4 ??
References: <01b001c75489$3ca57e80$3617040a@digeo.com> <7244bcd20702192347r5f8a60c2ve13d370dcbc1b1ef@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Olexiy Avramchenko wrote:

> > What are other folks doing?  Are people sticking with glibc 2.3.6
> > or older for now?
> 
> Is there any serious reason to pick 2.4 these days? I'd prefer to
> wait until it will be in debian unstable at least.

glibc 2.5 is in debian experimental, so it getting into unstable
shouldn't be too far off?

(The current debian ARM EABI port is basically sid built with
binutils and glibc from experimental, and that works fine, BTW.)

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Follow-Ups:
- Re: arm & mips & glibc >= 2.4 ??
  - From: Olexiy Avramchenko

References:
- arm & mips & glibc >= 2.4 ??
  - From: Chris MacGregor
- Re: arm & mips & glibc >= 2.4 ??
  - From: Olexiy Avramchenko

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]