This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
--- Khem Raj <khem@mvista.com> wrote: > As evidents from Paul's IWMMXt ABI is kind of intermediate thing which > got started in same direction to refine ABI requirements but then was > converted into a more detailed work to define ARM EABI therefore EABI is > complete so I would suggest youto use EABI instead. So if I don't specify an ABI but use --with-cpu=iwmmxt --with-arch=iwmmxt and do as I am targeting arm-iwmmxt-linux-gnueabi it should do the right thing wrt vectorizing etc? Or should I select AAPCS? Is this also likely to fix my problem of missing forced-unwind when compiling glibc?? Steve ___________________________________________________________ NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/ -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |