This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: specifying native compiler

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Robert Schwebel <robert at schwebel dot de>
Cc: "crossgcc at sourceware dot org" <crossgcc at sourceware dot org>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, David Karlton <dkarlton at themediamall dot com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:19:34 -0800
Subject: Re: specifying native compiler
References: <43BABE29.6@themediamall.com> <SERRANODYge2Qw4hVJb000001c5@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <a71bd89a0601031029h60ed415fj45759425fa31dd7d@mail.gmail.com> <20060103183605.GK19375@pengutronix.de>

On 1/3/06, Robert Schwebel <robert@schwebel.de> wrote:
> > Nope, sorry, crosstool.sh doesn't obey that convention.
> > There's even a hardcoded line or two like
> >   CC=gcc ...
> >   BUILD_CC=gcc
> > at one point in it.
>
> The commonly used variable names are CC_FOR_BUILD and CC. It would be
> pretty cool if crosstool would follow this convention.

CC_FOR_BUILD seems like a good suggestion given
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg01947.html

- Dan

--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- specifying native compiler
  - From: David Karlton
- RE: specifying native compiler
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: specifying native compiler
  - From: Dan Kegel
- Re: specifying native compiler
  - From: Robert Schwebel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]