This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 07:24:10AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>In summary, it *is* possible to build cross-toolchains on some arch's > >>without the Glibc headers step... > > > > > >and it's quite trivial to patch all the other arches (except for ia64) to > >not need libc or kernel headers > > Problem is, we'd have to carry those patches in crosstool > for the old versions. Is it worth the bother? i'm not suggesting we add this to crosstool, i'm merely talking about whether it can be done > For new versions, the patches should be submitted upstream > if they're not already in. ive tried before and for linux targets, people told me to take a hike > What's the deal with ia64? i believe it comes from all the libunwind stuff which ia64 requires -mike ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |