This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)

From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh at wantstofly dot org>
To: Steven Scholz <steven dot scholz at imc-berlin dot de>
Cc: crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:12:25 +0200
Subject: Re: ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)
References: <43033B8C.6050100@imc-berlin.de> <430344EE.1090507@imc-berlin.de>

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 04:08:46PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:

> I used Dan's crosstool to build the toolchain. How can I built a
> tool chain that makes "good code" (TM) for an arm920t _by default_?

Look at how it's done for 'arm-xscale' (demo-arm-xscale.sh and
arm-xscale.dat), that might be a good start.  (You don't want to
use 'xscale' since you're not on an ARMv5TE.)

--L

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)
  - From: Steven Scholz
- Re: ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)
  - From: Steven Scholz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]