This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Thanks again Dan! That did it. Looking at the results, 8 tests passed and 8 were unresolved. All the compilations passed and all of the executions were unresolved. I still need to look into what this means. J --- Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote: > EJS wrote: > > I've already build a cygwin to fedora toolchain > using > > crosstool sucessfully. (specifically using: > > eval `cat i686.dat > > gcc-3.4.3-glibc-2.3.5-hdrs-2.6.11.2.dat` sh > all.sh) > > > > I've been trying to test the toolchain using > crosstest > > for the past week or so and I've run into an > issue. It > > seems that crosstool always fails when running the > > command: > > REMOTE_TOP= > > make -n check cross-compiling=no > > run-program-prefix=xyzzy > make.out > > > > with a message: > > make[2]: *** No rule to make target > > > `/cygdrive/d/home/xzw0wf/crosstool-0.37/build/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4.3-glibc-2.3.5/build-glibc/csu/tst-empty.out', > needed by `tests'. Stop. > > > > > > I've traced it to the fact that my system does not > > like cross-compling option set to no. I've removed > the > > option and make check does complete successfully. > > I'd suggest skipping the glibc tests for > now, and trying just the gcc tests. > In other words, edit crosstest.sh > #--- glibc tests --- > if true; then > and change 'true' to false. > > > If someone could explain what setting the > > cross-compiling option to no does, that could at > least > > help. I assume it means that I compile for the > local > > system rather than for a remote one. If thats the > > case, why would should compiling locally fail? > > I think the comment's first line says it pretty > well: > > # Use a crufty, execrable kludge to extract the > commands needed to run glibc's tests. > > It's not surprising that it broke. I haven't tried > running the glibc tests for a year or two myself, > so maybe the kludge only works with older glibc's. > > - Dan > > -- > Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See > http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html > > ------ > Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, > http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ > Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to > crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail for Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |