This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Buildrpm question

From: Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Marc Karasek <marckarasek at ivivity dot com>
Cc: Daniel Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>, crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:10:23 -0700
Subject: Re: Buildrpm question
References: <1118170189.18986.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42A5EE44.1070503@kegel.com> <1118171270.18986.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Marc Karasek wrote:

I am interested in the MIPS. I have cross compiled gcc 3.4.1, glibc 2.3.2 and binutils 2.15. (Posted the patches for this to the mailing list, still owe you a patch for kernel 2.4.18 to work with gcc 4.x.) This is what I want to generate a rpm for. Personally, I liked it much better when you just specified -buildrpm and it would generate the rpm for whatever you were compiling.

I am curious why did you move away from this to the buildrpm.sh scripts??


Because I needed to have bona fide .src.rpm's to make
my users (and for that matter, Fedora Extras) happy.

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Buildrpm question
  - From: Marc Karasek

References:
- Buildrpm question
  - From: Marc Karasek
- Re: Buildrpm question
  - From: Daniel Kegel
- Re: Buildrpm question
  - From: Marc Karasek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]