Re: possible need for "no inline" patch from glibc-2.3.2?

[Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>]

Dan Kegel wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > the above *is* the latest (weekly) snapshot, although the next one is
> > apparently due out any minute now, i'll give it another go with that
> > one.
>
>
> Nah, I didn't notice you were using the latest, you're
> up to date enough.
>
> > > see if you can boil it down to a ten-line test case, and
> > > append that to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR15398, maybe.
> > > But one might also argue it's a glibc bug.  They'll
> > > fix it one of these days, once enough people are using gcc4...
> >
> >
> > i'm not sure i'm *that* ambitious. :-)  i'm just seeing how bleeding
> > edge i can have the components and see how far the build gets.  and if
> > a patch is obvious, i'll apply it and try again.  beyond that, i'm
> > kind of in over my head.  at least for now.
>
>
> You might at least add a comment at http://gcc.gnu.org/PR15398
> saying that you're seeing it, too, and telling them how
> to reproduce it (a one line description is fine if that's
> all you have time for)

Oh, if you do append a comment there, be sure to say whether
my patch was a satisfactory workaround, and give the url
to the patch.
- Dan

--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer?  See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com