Re: order of constructors

[Bill Randle <billr at neocat dot org>]

It might. It didn't exist in the days of gcc 2.7.2 when I used the 
method I outlined.

   -Bill

Bill Gatliff wrote:

> Guys:
>
>
> Does this work?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3.2/gcc/C---Attributes.html#C++%20Attributes 
>
>
>
> b.g.
>
>
>
> Bill Randle wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 18:10, Peter Barada wrote:
> >  
> >
> > > Is there any way to control the order of static constructors so that
> > > some that access other functions are done after those functions
> > > intializing fucntions are done?
> > >
> > > I guess I'm really asking is there any way to collect together a group
> > > of static constructors and then have them 'constructed' *after* some
> > > initialization functions for objects/libraries that they refer to have
> > > been called?
> > > --
> > > Peter Barada
> > > peter@the-baradas.com
> > >   
> >
> >
> > The way I've done that in the past is to put all the static constructors
> > that are order dependent into a single file - say StaticGlobals.cc -
> > then compile this file and link it in with everything else. The order
> > of construction is the order in which they are listed in the file.
> > (At least this was the case last time I did it.)
> >
> >     -Bill Randle
> >     billr@neocat.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ------
> > Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, 
> > http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
> > Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to 
> > crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
> >
> >  


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com