Re: order of constructors

[Bill Gatliff <bgat at billgatliff dot com>]

Guys:


Does this work?

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3.2/gcc/C---Attributes.html#C++%20Attributes


b.g.



Bill Randle wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 18:10, Peter Barada wrote:
>  
>
> > Is there any way to control the order of static constructors so that
> > some that access other functions are done after those functions
> > intializing fucntions are done?
> >
> > I guess I'm really asking is there any way to collect together a group
> > of static constructors and then have them 'constructed' *after* some
> > initialization functions for objects/libraries that they refer to have
> > been called? 
> >
> > --
> > Peter Barada
> > peter@the-baradas.com
> >    
>
> The way I've done that in the past is to put all the static constructors
> that are order dependent into a single file - say StaticGlobals.cc -
> then compile this file and link it in with everything else. The order
> of construction is the order in which they are listed in the file.
> (At least this was the case last time I did it.)
>
> 	-Bill Randle
> 	billr@neocat.org
>
>
>
> ------
> Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
> Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
>
>  

--
Bill Gatliff
In the dark on embedded GNU?  Step into the light.
bgat@billgatliff.com



------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com