This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:04:12AM +0900, kaz Kojima wrote: > Hi, > > Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote: > > I'll try that, thanks. I notice that the '.hidden' isn't in cvs yet. > > I also notice you've been trying to get that into CVS for two years > > now (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-10/msg00053.html). > > Time for another try? It'd be nice if gcc-3.4 (and maybe even gcc-3.3.3) > > didn't need a patch for this. > > The situation is a bit complicated. sh-linux target doesn't make > shared libgcc in gcc-3.3.x. > OTOH, I withdrew that .hidden patch because gcc-3.3 has a general > mechanism to make all libgcc functions .hidden. But I missed that > that mechanism was conditionalized later so that it's done only > when the target creates the shared libgcc. > In 3.4, sh-linux target becomes to use the shared libgcc like as > all other linux targets, so there is no problem. > > I inclined to backport 3.4 shared libgcc stuff to 3.3.3 rather > than the old .hidden patch. How do you think about it? > I'm happy if you or ZhouChang create a PR on gcc bugzilla about > this issue. For what it's worth, this patch looks pretty much like the one I'm using with 3.3.1. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |