Re: arm-elf-as dependency generation

[Bryce Schober <bryceman at dpzone dot com>]

Doug Evans wrote:

> I'm curious why you've decided to not try using the newer gcc
> dependency generation features (as outlined in a previous message
> of mine).

Sorry, I'm waaaay too young for my memory to be this bad.  That solution 
is what I've come around to anyway (see my second message in this 
thread.  Pardon my bad-memory-induced spam.

> The newer features of gcc obviate the need for much of the
> complication present in "the old newer way" (so to speak).

I noticed that the sed script that he uses for post-processing the 
dependency files results in wierd output.  What was that supposed to do 
in the first place?  It almost looks like its trying to be the 
equivalent of -MP, but I don't quite understand why I'd want -MP in the 
first place...

--
Bryce Schober
Design Engineer
Dynon Avionics, Inc.
www.dynonavionics.com

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by digiposs.com]


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com