This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:27:38PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > This is becoming a frequently asked question. > > The RPMs from Montavista are relocatable. > Not sure what technique they used to do that > (well, ok, I did look at some of their patches when I was writing > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-07/msg00155.html > so I could probably figure it out if I had to). The patches are huge and a terrible pain in the ass. > Relocatability is sneaking into the main tree; see > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00307.html > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00428.html > No idea how much is left to do, or how long it'll take. > Daniel, care to comment? GCC 3.4 will support it. Nothing earlier will to speak of. If you want more than that you get to backport the patches yourself :P > - Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Wilkins... > I want to be able to install [gcc-3.2.2] in any directory I want. > The problem is that the compiler cannot find its include directories ... > How do I get the compiler to use relative paths? > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe at sources dot redhat dot com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |