This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@luukku.com> wrote: > "karim" <bernardet.karim@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > > I want to have under linux a compiler which produces binaries for windows > > (with cygwin). > > It may be fully possible that gcc-3.2 cannot compile the C-library, > only gcc-3.2... Oops, where my thoughts were... What should have been here is that "only gcc-2.95.3 could perhaps be capable to build a rock-solid C- library for Cygwin"... My experience with gcc-3.x in building any tools, libs etc. C-stuff has been negative. It seems to be quite common experience that Insight cannot be built with gcc-3.2 (for Cygwin-host), but even binutils built using gcc-3.1.x or 3.2.x have failed on the Win32-host... So building Cygwin-hosted tools on Linux really doesn't need one to have gcc-3.2 but gcc-2.95.3-something there as the 'production compiler'. Maybe gcc-3.3 or 3.4 then works again with the existing (or they are already fixed) sources ported for Cygwin... ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |