This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GNUpro vs GCC

To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
Subject: Re: GNUpro vs GCC
From: Christian Groessler <cpg at aladdin dot de>
Date: 16 Jul 2001 15:17:42 +0200
Cc: cpg at aladdin dot de, Kai Ruottu <kai dot ruottu at luukku dot com>, crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com


On 07/16/2001 01:49:22 PM CET Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> So if I would try to merge the z8k support into the current cvs version,
>> there are chances that this will be accepted?
>
>I believe the correct approach is to ask Red Hat (assuming they were the
>authors) to contribute their code to the public sources.  Once that has
>been done then you can work on fixing/improving it.

This was the reason of my license question 2 postings ago. But it's
maybe the best idea to ask Redhat themselves.

>
>You cannot contribute code that is not yours to contribute...

You're completely right.

regards,
chris


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNUpro vs GCC
  - From: law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]