This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more infromation.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Fast Floating Point Alternatives for 68K and GCC?

To: David Williams <davidwilliams at ozemail dot com dot au>
Subject: Re: Fast Floating Point Alternatives for 68K and GCC?
From: will <will_lentz at trimble dot com>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:22:33 -0800
CC: "crossgcc at sourceware dot cygnus dot com" <crossgcc at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <38C0364A.F5E70B13@ozemail.com.au>


   One commercial solution is GoFast (see 
http://www.ussw.com/products/gofast/ for more details).  
I'm using the library on a MPC8xx platform, and it's significantly 
faster than the default GCC floating point support.

Also, I found the following link but haven't investigated
it -- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1999-07/msg00553.html

Will Lentz

David Williams wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to hear about any alternative floating point libaries for
> GCC that provide faster floating point support?
> I am interested in 32bit only (float) as well as 32/64 bit
> (float/double) alternatives.
> It would also be nice to know about accuracy of any alternatives.
> 
> TIA,
> David Williams.
> davidwilliams@ozemail.com.au
> 
> ------
> Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
> Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

References:
- Fast Floating Point Alternatives for 68K and GCC?
  - From: David Williams

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]