This is the mail archive of the
cgen@sourceware.org
mailing list for the CGEN project.
unable to find precise mode to match cpu word-bitsize 24
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- To: cgen at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:14:50 +0100
- Subject: unable to find precise mode to match cpu word-bitsize 24
Hello CGEN list,
I'm attempting to develop a model of a CPU that has a natural 24-bit
wordsize: 24-bit registers, 24-bit ALU, 24-bit data bus... 24-bit everything,
and no subword or unaligned accesses - in fact, you could really call them
24-bit bytes, as it's the minimum addressable unit.
A naive attempt to just write
(define-cpu
[ . . . ]
(word-bitsize 24)
[ . . . ]
)
fails with the error message from the title of this post. I've crudely hacked
in a couple of three-quarter int modes like this:
Index: mode.scm
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/cgen/mode.scm,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -p -u -r1.4 mode.scm
--- mode.scm 16 Jul 2003 05:35:47 -0000 1.4
+++ mode.scm 21 Jun 2009 18:45:00 -0000
@@ -499,6 +499,7 @@ Define a mode, all arguments specified.
(dfm 'QI "8 bit byte" '() 'INT 8 1 "int" "'x'" #f #f #f)
(dfm 'HI "16 bit int" '() 'INT 16 2 "int" "'x'" #f #f #f)
+ (dfm 'TQI "24 bit int" '() 'INT 24 3 "int" "'x'" #f #f #f)
(dfm 'SI "32 bit int" '() 'INT 32 4 "int" "'x'" #f #f #f)
(dfm 'DI "64 bit int" '(FN-SUPPORT) 'INT 64 8 "" "'D'" #f #f #f)
@@ -506,6 +507,8 @@ Define a mode, all arguments specified.
8 1 "unsigned int" "'x'" (mode:lookup 'QI) #f #f)
(dfm 'UHI "16 bit unsigned int" '() 'UINT
16 2 "unsigned int" "'x'" (mode:lookup 'HI) #f #f)
+ (dfm 'UTQI "24 bit unsigned int" '() 'UINT
+ 24 3 "unsigned int" "'x'" (mode:lookup 'TQI) #f #f)
(dfm 'USI "32 bit unsigned int" '() 'UINT
32 4 "unsigned int" "'x'" (mode:lookup 'SI) #f #f)
(dfm 'UDI "64 bit unsigned int" '(FN-SUPPORT) 'UINT
just so that I can get on with writing my i-fields, but will it work? If I
want my (simulated) pc to increment in steps of 1, not 3, should I define the
number of bytes to 1 instead of 3? Or would I be best off redefining QI mode
altogether? Sorry if this is a n00b question, but a bit of googling and
grepping didn't show up anyone trying this before.
cheers,
DaveK