This is the mail archive of the
cgen@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the CGEN project.
re: better handling of unknown operands
Ben Elliston writes:
> matthew> if you change the assertion to be:
>
> matthew> every format op is either:
> matthew> - SEM-ONLY, or
> matthew> - has a matching syntax op, and
> matthew> every syntax op has matching format op.
>
> matthew> is there a case that this doesn't work with? i looked at the current
> matthew> cgen input files and none of them appear to use the former currently,
> matthew> but it definately should be supported. i can't think of a case for
> matthew> operands used for parsing purposes that don't have format ifields, but
> matthew> if there were, you could extend this with a (new? same?) attribute to
> matthew> indicate it was such.
>
> Anyone? Anyone?
I don't quite understand the question.