This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Should we have a 2.29.1 point release ?
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:48:48 +0100
- Subject: Re: Should we have a 2.29.1 point release ?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nickc at redhat dot com
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 2F95BC0546F8
- References: <1f0c2746-a030-6c7b-2b3c-ae2790728cbd@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOr5kHqpRL=GWpgrnUUc127dtB=WHqjnbX0UtY49A1+3Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Guys,
On 15/08/17 00:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
> I think we need 2.29.1. Give OSVs a couple more weeks with 2.29
> to work out the most serious bugs.
That works for me. I am about to go on vacation for a week, and then
there is the GNU Tools Cauldron coming up. So, baring unforeseen
circumstances, I will create a 2.29.1 release upon return from Prague,
(ie 12/13 September).
Cheers
Nick