This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RPATH vs RUNPATH

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 18:28:22 +0100
Subject: Re: RPATH vs RUNPATH
References: <CAH6eHdRLVwrPkd7cOtQKqrbEgtKkxs-5WFN=ennm7+7fsDt+Eg@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205031559510.25409@wotan.suse.de> <201205031223.19470.vapier@gentoo.org>

On 3 May 2012 17:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2012 10:03:07 Michael Matz wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 May 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> > Are there any plans in the foreseeable future to switch the default to
>> > --enable-new-dtags,
>>
>> As a data point for this part of the question: we enabled new-dtags by
>> default for our binutils back in 2004 and never heard a complaint, so
>> maybe it's really time to just switch the default; they aren't terribly
>> "new" anymore :)
>
> same in Gentoo ... earliest date i can find off hand is Jan 2005

Ah, I hadn't realise that. Thanks for the data points.

References:
- RPATH vs RUNPATH
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: RPATH vs RUNPATH
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: RPATH vs RUNPATH
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]