This is the mail archive of the archer@sourceware.org mailing list for the Archer project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Meeting 2009-02-11

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>,Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at br dot ibm dot com>,Project Archer <archer at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:05:05 -0800
Subject: Re: Meeting 2009-02-11
References: <m3r625rb80.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1234318043.4095.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <m3skmkn1pi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20090214130523.GA9542@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <m34oys37h1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

> IMO, FSF ChangeLog style, though I don't think we really discussed that.
> I also wouldn't mind an FSF-style entry plus text describing the purpose.

That's what I do for my own local branches, and it works really well.

The leading text describing the purpose of the change is really helpful
when coming back to that patch later in order to submit it, and we've
seen this sort of description being used in the real ChangeLog files,
lately. I like this practice, especially when the description is concise.

-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Meeting 2009-02-11
  - From: Thiago Jung Bauermann

References:
- Meeting 2009-02-11
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Meeting 2009-02-11
  - From: Thiago Jung Bauermann
- Re: Meeting 2009-02-11
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Meeting 2009-02-11
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Meeting 2009-02-11
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]