This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: question about implements-prefix
- From: Don Bruey <dbruey at creativesolutions dot com>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:09:21 -0500
- Subject: RE: [xsl] question about implements-prefix
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
In the case of the original question, the namespace URI mattered. Not
putting in the correct URI for the "user" namespace meant that the extension
function in question would not be recognized.
In my example, I mentioned XSL's namespace as an example of something that
if you change it, your stylesheet won't work as you might expect, which is
an easy example to try to see what happens when you just put in any old URI.
When I teach XML, I use that very example to show how namespaces work and
what URIs mean to processors, and it's a pretty effective example.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:43 PM
To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: [xsl] question about implements-prefix
> It absolutely matters what you put there.
Not really, in that if you put _any_ string there except the namespace
names of xslt and msxsl the stylesheet will act in exactly the same way.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list