This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug tapsets/23799] New: sprint_ustack() returns empty strings while sprint_ubacktrace() does not
- From: "agentzh at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:59:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tapsets/23799] New: sprint_ustack() returns empty strings while sprint_ubacktrace() does not
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23799
Bug ID: 23799
Summary: sprint_ustack() returns empty strings while
sprint_ubacktrace() does not
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tapsets
Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
Reporter: agentzh at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Consider the following minimal C program:
```
int foo(void) {
return 3;
}
int bar(void) {
return foo();
}
int main(void) {
bar();
return 0;
}
```
Compile and link it like this:
```
gcc -g test.c
```
And then run the following stap oneliner:
```
stap -e 'probe process.function("foo") { printf("{%s}\n{%s}",
sprint_ustack(ubacktrace()), sprint_ubacktrace()); }' -c ./a.out --ldd
```
And the output is
```
{}
{foo+0x4 [a.out]
bar+0x9 [a.out]
main+0x9 [a.out]
__libc_start_main+0xea [libc-2.26.so]
_start+0x2a [a.out]}
```
The weird thing is that `sprint_ustack(ubacktrace())` returns an empty string
while `sprint_ubacktrace()` does not. Why the difference? Is there a bug in
`sprint_ustack()`? Any hints on debugging this thing?
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.