This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] Make the 3rd operand of ternary '?:' bind tighter than binary '='

From: "Yichun Zhang (agentzh)" <agentzh at gmail dot com>
To: systemtap at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:41:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make the 3rd operand of ternary '?:' bind tighter than binary '='
References: <20180827230535.60969-1-agentzh@gmail.com> <20180828172601.70071-1-agentzh@gmail.com>

Hello!

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:26 AM Yichun Zhang (agentzh) wrote:
> In the C language, the 3rd operand of the ternary operator binds tighter
> than the binary assignment operators. It is better for the stap language
> to be consistent with C in operator precedence.
>

Just for the record, I've just changed `parse_assignment ()` back to
`parse_expression ()` as per fche's suggestion and committed it to
master with his green light on IRC.

Best,
Yichun

References:
- [PATCH] Make the 3rd operand of ternary '?:' bind tighter than binary '='
  - From: Yichun Zhang (agentzh)
- [PATCH v2] Make the 3rd operand of ternary '?:' bind tighter than binary '='
  - From: Yichun Zhang (agentzh)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]