This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: arm64 kprobes patches


On 27 February 2014 11:34, Masami Hiramatsu
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:
> (2014/02/27 13:56), Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
>> On 27 February 2014 07:44, Masami Hiramatsu
>> <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:
>>> (2014/02/27 0:02), Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We have uploaded arm64 kprobes latest changes on linaro git which
>>>> include some fixes for recursive kprobes. These are rebased on top of
>>>> 3.14-rc3.  Kprobes support can be enabled by enabling
>>>> "General setup  --->  [*] Kprobes" config option.
>>>>
>>>> Git location:  git://git.linaro.org/people/sandeepa.prabhu/linux-aarch64.git
>>>>  Branch: arm64_kprobes_3.14-rc3
>>>
>>> Great! Thank you for working on that!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please let us know if you are interested in pulling this branch for
>>>> systemtap test-suite verification, while we are trying to include
>>>> systemtap test-suite on our linaro open-embedded platforms.
>>>>
>>>> Also, please let us know if there are documentation on howto run full
>>>> test-suite for systemtap and various criteria  kprobes should meet?
>>>
>>> One possible testing is putting kprobes on all functions in the
>>> kernel by using ftrace interface. (On x86, current kprobes still has
>>> some problems, and I solved, will send the series later)
>> OK we will try to verify this with arm64 ftrace patches (from linaro)
>> which are close to get accepted upstream.
>> Has your earlier patches (kprobes blacklist related) been queued-up
>> for upstream?
>
> Yes, I updated and will post the series soon. :)
>
>> Are you planning generic kprobes API changes ?
>
> No, actually generic API is still same. But internal API will
> be added.
Ok thanks, this mean we have to update arch-specific code after your
series gets mainlined, we can help testing your patches on arm64,
guess your major verification platform is x86 :)
Cheers,
~Sandeepa
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Masami HIRAMATSU
> IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
> Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
> E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]