This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: which function is instrumentable?

From: William Cohen <wcohen at redhat dot com>
To: systemtap at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:42:09 -0400
Subject: Re: which function is instrumentable?
References: <AANLkTi=dQW+9cDd_NtmKygbdY9O8qK49=fLePCki1q-M@mail.gmail.com> <20110323074918.GA4614@baltika> <AANLkTi=X+iYwOGxY2QVhgA2LT+qe4GueGVy_dhDS1sDn@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/23/2011 04:23 AM, Zhiwei Ying wrote:
> I see. What I am looking for is to exclude those bad-function
> automatically. I can write a script to test the function one by one,
> but it's ugly.
> 
> Can stap provides some hint about the probability, which could be used
> to estimate the correctness of instrumentation?
> 
> Can stap exclude those inlined function with some option?
> 

The following will exclude the inlined functions:

stap -l 'module("foo").function("*").call'


-Will

References:
- which function is instrumentable?
  - From: Zhiwei Ying
- Re: which function is instrumentable?
  - From: Adrien Kunysz
- Re: which function is instrumentable?
  - From: Zhiwei Ying

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]