This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: user instruction tracing patch?
> Well, Frank's syntax is prettier in this example. I had assumed that
> Roland's approach included some way to name a probe, so that the enable
> statement/function could use that instead of the explicit probe
I wasn't specific about the real syntax, but I did expect something like
that. My point really was not about the specificity of the identifier;
the points you bring up about that are good ones that I haven't addressed.
I was simply reacting to the idea of "changing any script variable can run
magic hooks" as opposed to more explicit syntax for magic hooks.