This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs
- From: "fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 20 Sep 2007 00:38:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug documentation/5049] Support relative and absolute pathnames in probe PATTERNs
- References: <20070919214402.5049.jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2007-09-20 00:38 -------
> Am I correct in thinking that the pathname must be relative?
Not exactly. The path name patterns need to match the path names as
seen by the compiler. A Red Hat kernel build happens to use relative
names, but others may not. We should try harder to support both, perhaps
with an implicit "**"-equivalent widget at the front of the path name
string.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Document relative vs. |Support relative and
|absolute pathnames in probe |absolute pathnames in probe
|PATTERNs |PATTERNs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5049
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.