This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
bug-fix reviews [was: Bug 4930]
- From: Jim Keniston <jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Vara Prasad <prasadav at us dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: systemTAP <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:08:43 -0700
- Subject: bug-fix reviews [was: Bug 4930]
- References: <46E9FE4F.7060008@oracle.com> <46EAA3EB.3090909@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:08 -0700, Vara Prasad wrote:
> Wenji Huang wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Regarding to bug 4930, I created patches for it
> > (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4930).
> > Please kindly review it. If no objection, I will commit it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wenji
>
> Can we follow/change our review process to that of kernel where patch is
> posted inline in the mailing list for review instead of posting/placing
> elsewhere? I am hoping having patches readily available in the mail
> client improves our review process and avoids costly mistakes.
>
> bye,
> Vara Prasad
It's definitely appropriate to attach the patch to the bugzilla. To get
a review, you either need to ensure that appropriate reviewers are on
the bugzilla's cc list, or explicitly request a review, as Wenji has
done. I don't find it inconvenient to follow a couple of links to get
at the patch.
I prefer to see review accomplished via the bugzilla mechanism, so that
the thread is captured in the bugzilla. Of course, this typically
restricts visibility of the review thread to the bug owner and the
bugzilla's cc list. Pro: Uninterested people aren't bothered with
extraneous emails. Con: (a) A relevant reviewer may be excluded from
the cc list. (b) If the review thread forks off a thread that warrants
wider participation, somebody has to take the trouble to move that
thread out of the bugzilla.
Jim