This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Avoid implicit declarations in long double complex functions


I've been informed that this has bad interactions with libc++, since
it will provide different implementations of cosl etc such that the
complex math functions will then work. The layering of these
interactions is really unfortunate. I'll need to table this patch
until we come up with a good solution.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:41 PM Dionna Amalie Glaze
<dionnaglaze@google.com> wrote:
>
> I reapplied the patch on a fresh clone here.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:05 AM Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dionna,
> >
> > On Jun 12 17:14, Dionna Amalie Glaze via newlib wrote:
> > > Hi y'all, I came across some compilation errors that the following patch
> > > fixed. Most long double complex math functions use long double real
> > > functions that are only defined #ifdef _LDBL_EQ_DBL, so I extended that to
> > > the functions that use them.
> >
> > Your patch doesn't apply, Pretty much all hunks have fuzz, and
> > git am returns with "error: corrupt patch at line 241"
> >
> > Can you check, please?  If that's a MUA isssue, you could attach
> > the patch as plain text.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Corinna
> >
> > --
> > Corinna Vinschen
> > Cygwin Maintainer
> > Red Hat
>
>
>
> --
> -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)



-- 
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]