This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] AMD GCN: Implement circular buffering.

From: Andrew Stubbs <ams at codesourcery dot com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: <newlib at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:07:05 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD GCN: Implement circular buffering.
References: <20190318161809.70522-1-ams@codesourcery.com> <20190318174946.GK3908@calimero.vinschen.de> <47813836-3ac3-49d6-84ad-5077520a78f3@codesourcery.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903191502140.28447@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 19/03/2019 15:03, Joseph Myers wrote:

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Andrew Stubbs wrote:

Is there a preferred way to prevent the "OK?" getting included in the commit
message? Or does one just avoid all chit-chat these days?


See "man git-am".  Anything not intended as part of the commit message
(including e.g. descriptions of what changed since the previous posted
revision of the patch) can go after a "---" line.


Thanks Joseph.

I saw that, but I read "--- is taken as the beginning of a patch", whichisn't quite the same thing. Anyway TIL.


Andrew

References:
- [PATCH] AMD GCN: Implement circular buffering.
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [PATCH] AMD GCN: Implement circular buffering.
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [PATCH] AMD GCN: Implement circular buffering.
  - From: Andrew Stubbs
- Re: [PATCH] AMD GCN: Implement circular buffering.
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]