This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Oct 10 22:25, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 18:05, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 10 17:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Oct 10 17:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > On Oct 10 11:22, Craig Howland wrote: > > > > > On 10/10/2018 10:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 10 15:48, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 11:41, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Oct 8 15:06, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It does help on aarch64-elf, but a change to rdimon.specs is required > > > > > > > because libc now depends on libm: this can be seen when compiling a > > > > > > > C++ hello.cpp. > > > > > > Hmm, that's an interesting point. What I don't understand is why this > > > > > > dependency wasn't already visible before. strtod.c and wcstod.c call > > > > > > nan() and nanf(), vfprintf.c and vfwprintf.c call nanf(). Why is a > > > > > > call to nanl() different? > > > > > The nanl() call was only added perhaps a few weeks ago. At that time we > > > > > missed the thought that it comes from libm. We'd need to add it to > > > > > newlib/Makefile to be copied like s_nan and sf_nan presently are. > > > > > > > > Yeah, just found this myself. nan/nanf are pulled in via newlib's > > > > top-level Makefile.am: > > > > > > > > MATHOBJS_IN_LIBC = ... > > > > > > > > Pulling in nanl is a problem because it's build depends on > > > > HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE. > > > > > > > > Maybe we should really just use __builtin_nanl in strtorx.c...? > > > > > > ...and build strtorx.c only if HAVE_LONG_DOUBLE, just like strtold.c and > > > wcstold.c. > > > > I pushed three patches to handle all of the above. Please give them > > a try. > > > I confirm it works for me on aarch64. > Thanks! Thanks for testing. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |