This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] In _IEEE_LIBM mode, use weak symbols instead of wrapper funcs [v2]

From: "Keith Packard" <keithp at keithp dot com>
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco dot Dijkstra at arm dot com>, "howland\@LGSInnovations.com" <howland at LGSInnovations dot com>
Cc: nd <nd at arm dot com>, "newlib\@sourceware.org" <newlib at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 06:57:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] In _IEEE_LIBM mode, use weak symbols instead of wrapper funcs [v2]
References: <DB5PR08MB1030ED88186FB81606E302C583160@DB5PR08MB1030.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com> writes:

> So the question is, is there any reason why _IEEE_LIBM should not be the default?

I don't think we can do that if we want to provide a POSIX-compatible
library anywhere -- POSIX defines errno values for specific cases.

-- 
-keith

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] In _IEEE_LIBM mode, use weak symbols instead of wrapper funcs [v2]
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra

References:
- Re: [PATCH] In _IEEE_LIBM mode, use weak symbols instead of wrapper funcs [v2]
  - From: Wilco Dijkstra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]