This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk

From: Michael Mamic <michael dot mamic77 at gmail dot com>
To: freddie_chopin at op dot pl
Cc: Emeka lewis <emekamicro at gmail dot com>, newlib at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:22:29 -0700
Subject: Re: Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk
References: <CAChm1gQqnt-NcO4GG=RKZcHD7HrcFuwLjtDeTupT00Kh0pcXng@mail.gmail.com> <CAOypoo74gb-dU=4rJuqowjPcw0e19WYtypJkGGY38WazMCLCWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChm1gSPXUrs8DF3MdAeE2J6wqJs4nY4jyini8YsAYVKx833BQ@mail.gmail.com> <2b75ecb9249f83cd27018e7275f30cf425d9e9a3.camel@op.pl>

I did not receive that email, but I have followed it's advice and updated
the syscalls file. I still have the same error as before.

A similar incr value of huge proportions is passed to sbrk when Lua is
initialized. I need to find out why this is happening so I can adjust for
it.

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:31 AM Freddie Chopin <freddie_chopin@op.pl>
wrote:

> Hi Michael
>
> Your sbrk() code is still wrong... Did you get my e-mail (via the
> list)?
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2018/msg00772.html
>
> Regards,
> FCh
>
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk
  - From: Freddie Chopin
- Re: Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk
  - From: Bob Dunlop

References:
- Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk
  - From: Michael Mamic
- Re: Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk
  - From: Emeka
- Re: Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk
  - From: Michael Mamic
- Re: Huge numbers for incr passed to _sbrk
  - From: Freddie Chopin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]