This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Jul 27 09:40, Sebastian Huber wrote: > From: "ed@FreeBSD.org" <ed@FreeBSD.org> > > GCC only activates C11 keywords in C mode, not C++ mode. This means > that when targeting an older C++ standard, we cannot fall back to using > _Static_assert(). In this case, do define _Static_assert() as a macro > that uses a typedef'ed array. > > Discussed in: r322875 commit thread > Reported by: Mark MIllard > MFC after: 1 month > --- > newlib/libc/include/sys/cdefs.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/sys/cdefs.h b/newlib/libc/include/sys/cdefs.h > index b3f8d1965..49be9e062 100644 > --- a/newlib/libc/include/sys/cdefs.h > +++ b/newlib/libc/include/sys/cdefs.h > @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ > #if (defined(__cplusplus) && __cplusplus >= 201103L) || \ > __has_extension(cxx_static_assert) > #define _Static_assert(x, y) static_assert(x, y) > -#elif __GNUC_PREREQ__(4,6) > +#elif __GNUC_PREREQ__(4,6) && !defined(__cplusplus) > /* Nothing, gcc 4.6 and higher has _Static_assert built-in */ > #elif defined(__COUNTER__) > #define _Static_assert(x, y) __Static_assert(x, __COUNTER__) > -- > 2.13.7 ACK to series. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |