This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Aug 28 18:50, Sichen Zhao wrote:
> > On Aug 26 21:28, Sichen Zhao wrote:
> > > ---
> > > newlib/libc/string/strnstr.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/newlib/libc/string/strnstr.c b/newlib/libc/string/strnstr.c
> > > index da5e5bd..7c87bbd 100644
> > > --- a/newlib/libc/string/strnstr.c
> > > +++ b/newlib/libc/string/strnstr.c
> > > @@ -44,22 +44,14 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: head/lib/libc/string/strnstr.c 251069 2013-05-28 20:57:40Z e
> > > * first slen characters of s.
> > > */
> > > char *
> > > -strnstr(const char *s, const char *find, size_t slen)
> > > +strnstr(const char *haystack, const char *needle, size_t haystack_len)
> > > {
> > > - char c, sc;
> > > - size_t len;
> > > + size_t needle_len = strnlen(needle, haystack_len);
> > > - if ((c = *find++) != '\0') {
> > > - len = strlen(find);
> > > - do {
> > > - do {
> > > - if (slen-- < 1 || (sc = *s++) == '\0')
> > > - return (NULL);
> > > - } while (sc != c);
> > > - if (len > slen)
> > > - return (NULL);
> > > - } while (strncmp(s, find, len) != 0);
> > > - s--;
> > > - }
> > > - return ((char *)s);
> > > + if (needle_len < haystack_len || !needle[needle_len]) {
> > > + char *x = memmem(haystack, haystack_len, needle, needle_len);
> > > + if (x && !memchr(haystack, 0, x - haystack))
> > > + return x;
> > > + }
> > > + return NULL;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > Input needed:
> >
> > Given this is a complete reimplementation not based on FreeBSD code at
> > all, and given the code has been contributed by Eric, shouldn't we
> > remove the entire copyright header and move this under newlib default
> > licensing?
> Including remove the "__FBSDID("$FreeBSD: head/lib/libc/string/strnstr.c
> 251069 2013-05-28 20:57:40Z emaste $");", right?
Yes, that would make sense in that case I think. But wait until
we have some input from Eric at least.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |