This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mar 24 13:27, Freddie Chopin wrote: > On 03/24/2015 11:03 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Mar 23 19:33, Mike Stump wrote: > >>Should 183c67027c75ccc0f5b4953ce65a85eaa710e826 be tagged with newlib-2_2_0? > >> > >>I pulled down from the git repo and didnât see a tag for newlib-2_2_0. > >Sure you pulled from the right repo? There's no SHA1 ID > >183c67027c75ccc0f5b4953ce65a85eaa710e826 in the newlib-cygwin.git repo > >afaics. > > > >If anything, this should be 0615b4bb5f38a738377d4856aed167f0ab6aa52d. > > It seems that the "right" repo doesn't have this tag either. That was the SHA1 sum and it points to the last change for 2.2.0: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=0615b4bb5f38a738377d4856aed167f0ab6aa52d > Moreover - tag > for 2.1.0 looks more like some strange merge commit for 2.2.0. > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=38b85aed54f123088f578c98ead9474c3237b913 Ok, I'm not that familiar with git yet, so I don't grok where the newlib-2_1_0 commit comes from, but I see a newlib-2_2_0 tag (or branch, whatever) in the repo which appears to point to the right thing, no? https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/newlib-2_2_0 Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
Attachment:
pgpQ3nR14hQEs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |