This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH arm] synchronize newlib/libc/sys/arm with libgloss/arm

From: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>
To: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, newlib at sourceware dot org, Bin Cheng <bin dot cheng at arm dot com>, newlib at sources dot redhat dot com, 'Nick Clifton' <nickc at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:35:30 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH arm] synchronize newlib/libc/sys/arm with libgloss/arm
References: <4eb7a1ba.6824440a.5553.ffffcc84SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <201111141145.43362.vapier@gentoo.org> <4EC23951.40009@rtems.org>

On 11/15/2011 11:05 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

On 11/14/2011 05:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:

On Monday 07 November 2011 04:14:53 Bin Cheng wrote:

I am synchronizing the newlib/libc/sys/arm with libgloss/arm.
The arm.h and crt0.S have already been synced, here comes this patch
finishing the work.


my first question is, why ? i thought the point of libgloss was to get
all of
the syscall/etc... logic out of newlib completely.

Exactly.

I will likely revert all of the recent arm changes to newlib, because
they are probably are inapplicable to the RTEMS toolchains.

Sorry, this was poorly formulated: I meant, I will likely revert the arm changes to newlib in RTEMS's newlib sources/RTEMS newlib fork.

Ralf

References:
- Re: [PATCH arm] synchronize newlib/libc/sys/arm with libgloss/arm
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [PATCH arm] synchronize newlib/libc/sys/arm with libgloss/arm
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]