This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: mcgrathr at google dot com, newlib at sourceware dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:55:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
References: <x57j8vnyywcb.fsf@frobland.mtv.corp.google.com> <mcraa8dj2xv.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAB=4xhqvOqwW_YF086y3k8MfNDDC+r6MKj8Jp+G_YMfG+VCesA@mail.gmail.com> <mcrty6lf6ky.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>

> Ideally I'd like to see a build maintainer approve it.  Perhaps I missed
> that.

I've got my usual paranoia about command line lengths being stressed,
but I suspect we're already way past the limits on the ones that will
actually fail.

The patch looks OK to me.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [top-level patch] Do proper target tool checks for readelf
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]