This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] CPU-time clocks


On May 16 15:17, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 02:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >On 05/16/2011 01:02 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On May 15 14:35, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >>>On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 13:49 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >>>>I have a patch pending for Cygwin to support POSIX CPU-time clocks, but
> >>>>newlib needs to be patched first.
> >>>>
> >>>>Unfortunately, newlib's clock ID definitions are not POSIX-compliant;
> >>>>the names are missing the ending "_ID". Fixing this will affect RTEMS,
> >>>>as they have been using the misnamed definitions for some time. I have
> >>>>a patch for RTEMS' CVS HEAD, but the ramifications may be larger than
> >>>>that, I don't know.
> >>>>
> >>>>Patch attached.
> >>
> >>Thanks. Maybe we should just define CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME and
> >>CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME for rtems as well. So the rtems maintainers
> >>can decide when this can go away:
> >
> >RTEMS prefers to stay in-line with POSIX.
> >
> >I.e. a radical switch from *_CPUTIME_ID for RTEMS would be OK with me.
> Typo, sorry. This should have been
> ... switch from *_CPUTIME to _CPUTIME_ID ...would be OK

Cool.  In that case the newlib part of your patch is fine, Yaakov.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]