This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sourceware.org
mailing list for the newlib project.
R: complex functions documentation
- From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri at yahoo dot it>
- To: "newlib at sourceware dot org" <newlib at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:55:37 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: R: complex functions documentation
--- Mar 12/10/10, Marco Atzeri ha scritto:
> --- Mar 12/10/10, Marco Atzeri?
> ha scritto:
>
> > Documentation for the complex
> > functions.
> >
> > libm/complex/complex.tex is very minimal
> >
> >
> > Changelog:
> >
> > * libm/Makefile.am: added complex functions
> documentation
> > * libm/complex/Makefile.am: Ditto
> > * libm/complex/complex.tex: Ditto
> > * libm/complex/(cabs.c, cacos.c, cacosh.c, carg.c,
> > ? ???casin.c, casinh.c, catan.c,
> > catanh.c, ccos.c, ccosh.c,
> > ? ???cexp.c, cimag.c, clog.c, conj.c,
> > cpow.c, cproj.c, creal.c,
> > ? ???csin.c, csinh.c, csqrt.c, ctan.c,
> > ctanh.c): Ditto
> > * libm/Makefile.in: Regenerate
> > * libm/complex/Makefile.in: Ditto
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Marco
> >
>
> pdf documentation build fines, but I just discovered that
> info and html don't.
>
> targetdep.tex:220: `Complex' has no Up field (perhaps
> incorrect sectioning?).
>
> Marco
>
additional path to solve the info build.
Is it normal that libc.info and libm.info
are built in the source tree instead of the build tree ?
Marco
--- src/newlib/libm/libm.texinfo 2009-12-17 21:41:42.000000000 +0100
+++ src_new/newlib/libm/libm.texinfo 2010-10-12 19:41:31.625000000 +0200
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
@menu
* Math:: The mathematical functions (`math.h').
+* Complex:: The mathematical complex functions (`complex.h').
* Reentrancy:: The functions in libm are not reentrant by default.
* Long Double Functions:: The long double function support of libm.
* Index::