This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Fwd: Re: [libgfortran,patch] Add fallback functions tgamma, lgamma, tgammaf and lgammaf]



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [libgfortran,patch] Add fallback functions tgamma, lgamma,
 tgammaf and lgammaf
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:43:44 +0000
From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert@gmail.com>
To: Tim Prince <tprince@computer.org>
CC: fortran@gcc.gnu.org List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0711170922001.956@homepc>
<A89D0A2D-5CA2-4B9A-8F19-D5B47F36C66D@gmail.com>
<473EF7F0.30405@computer.org>

> Do you mean submit a patch to support those functions in newlib?

That's even better, and probably easy now that I've contributed a C
implementation to libgfortran.

>
This subject was brought up a few weeks ago:
http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg01049.html

Should gfortran configure be set up to avoid relying on newlib for these
functions, or should a patch be submitted to newlib?
It seems most of us are unfamiliar with details of newlib patch submission.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]